
InverseIn progress
A Tbilisi stocktaking firm, and the tool its own counters use. A worker photographs a shelf, the system reads the still, counts what it can see per SKU and says how sure it is — then a person decides.
6 notes
- In progress — the marketing site and the platform pages are standing; the tool itself is being built and the pricing is marked as awaiting commercial sign-off rather than quietly presented as final.
- The verification runs on a still frame, not a live stream. A frame is the thing that gets stored, re-checked and shown to an auditor months later; a stream is gone the moment it plays. For a count that has to be defensible, evidence beats immediacy.
- Every SKU gets a verdict rather than a guess: green matches, yellow needs a human, red means the record is wrong. Nothing reaches the ledger without a person confirming it — an inventory system that silently writes its own numbers is a liability, not a feature.
- The interesting part is where the camera is admitted to be useless. Two products from one line are identical at a metre and differ only in size, so those get flagged for a barcode check with the likely candidates named. Saying ‘I cannot tell these apart’ is worth more than a confident wrong count.
- Tenants are isolated at the database level rather than by code that might forget a filter. With client stock figures, that is the difference between an architecture and a hope.
- Written in Georgian first, with English and Russian alongside — the buyers are warehouse and retail managers in Tbilisi.
















